Cigar Extra: CAO Flathead Steel Horse

  • Image courtesy CAO/General Cigar

    Image courtesy CAO/General Cigar

    Vitola: Apehanger

  • 5.5” x 58 ring gauge
  • MSRP $8.99
  • Received from General Cigar

Background

I said I wouldn’t do any “full reviews” of IPCPR samples, but some of those samples were just too good to ignore and wait for the shipping cigars, so I compromised…I decided to feature a couple that I got multiple samples of in a Cigar Extra setting. First up is the Flathead Steel Horse by CAO.

To review, the Flathead was the 2014 release from CAO and it has done quite well in the marketplace. I’ve called it the “best thing CAO has done since General took over.” It’s a flavorful and enjoyable smoking experience at a very good price tag. As a followup, the minds at CAO decided to do a version to appeal to motorcycle riders, especially after finding out that there is a “flathead” engine in a bike.

This version features Honduran, Nicaraguan and Dominican fillers, a Brazilian Arapiraca binder, and a “proprietary” Connecticut Habano Grueso wrapper. While it has the flat head like the original release, this version is not box-pressed, but round in shape.

Notes

Following my usual practice with the Flathead lines, I double-punched this cigar, with the result looking like a double-barrel shotgun. I feel like it’s the only way to deal with the very flat surface on the smoking end of the cigar.

Initial puffs on the Steel Horse featured flavors of oak, earth and a dark fruit sweetness. There was a touch of white pepper on the retrohale, along with more oak notes.

I paired the Steel Horse with the last of my Old Fitzgerald Bourbon. It adds to my theory that just about any cigar can pair with just about any Bourbon, although this cigar would have gone better with perhaps some Laphroiag Scotch or a spicier rye whiskey.

In the second third, I did get more pepper spice, but also some notes of cinnamon along with the oak and earth.

As I got toward the end, the flavors got a little sour and I found myself not enjoying it as much. It was still good, but not as good as I initially said.

In my opinion, what’s really missing from the Steel Horse release is a smaller ring gauge version. Even something like a 50 would allow for a brighter flavor profile that might really work. At this point, though, we are stuck with two sizes of 58 and 66 ring gauge. Hopefully that’s something CAO and General will rectify soon.

David Jones

David has been smoking premium cigars since 2001. He is co-founder and editor-in-chief of Leaf Enthusiast. He worked as a full-time retail tobacconist for over 4 years at Burns Tobacconist in Chattanooga, TN. Currently he works full-time as a graphic designer for ClearBox Strategies, also based in Chattanooga.

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. Mark VanSledright says:

    Yes, smaller ring gauges.

  2. Texican says:

    Makes me want to revisit the original. Didn’t care for it the first time, but my palate has matured more since then.

  3. Craig says:

    Im looking forward to trying this one, especially after the “engine” series that I enjoyed. Thanks Dave.

  4. Swede214 says:

    Sounds like a so, so, cigar, and the price, I’ll pass.

  5. bob langmaid says:

    Thoroughly enjoyed the 554 and 660, can’t wait to try this one!!

  6. Ed says:

    Great minds think alike, Dave. Rick’s been playing with some smaller rings on this. Vs. Pilon where he’s trying out some larger ones. Just need a little time – and we need to catch up on production. It’s been crazy so far.

  7. czerbe says:

    I have only had a handful of these and when I say handful I mean like 3 not even a full handful… well unless you have only 3 fingers… and I enjoyed them.